Project Team
Stacy Denton, Arts First | English Language and Literature
Barb Bloemhof, Arts First | Economics
Project Summary
Student engagement and agency in higher education has the potential to enhance learning and foster leadership capabilities, a particularly valuable innovation in the first-year classroom because of its potential for durable change. This project proposes expanding the instructor/student relationship by adding a pedagogical partnership between students enrolled in first-year seminars and third-year students who have had an opportunity to integrate their first-year seminar experience into their subsequent coursework. This pilot case study aims to enhance enrolled and upper-year students’ identities within a specific classroom, discipline and university environment by leveraging three interlocking foci: novel student-centered pedagogic approaches in the first-year classroom; content co-creation’s effectiveness in fostering empowerment for first-year students; and reflective insights of upper-level students whose developing academic capabilities were first honed in the first-year seminar environment of Arts First.
References
Bovill, C. (2019). Co-creation in learning and teaching: the case for a whole-class approach in higher education.ÌýHigher Education,Ìý79(6), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w Ìý
Bovill, C., Bulley, C. J., & Morss, K. (2011). Engaging and empowering first-year students through curriculum design: perspectives from the literature.ÌýTeaching in Higher Education,Ìý16(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.515024 Ìý
Charmaz, K. (2006).ÌýConstructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis.ÌýLondon: Sage Publications Limited.
Cook-Sather, A., Bahti, M., & Ntem, A, (2019).ÌýPedagogical Partnerships: A How-To Guide for Faculty, Students, and Academic Developers in Higher Education. Elon University Center for Engaged Learning. https://doi.org/10.36284/celelon.oa1 Ìý
Friere, P. (2005).ÌýPedagogy of the oppressed: 30thÌýanniversary edition.Ìý(M. Bergman Ramos, Trans.). The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc. (Original work published 1970)
Kahu, Picton, C., & Nelson, K. (2020). Pathways to engagement: a longitudinal study of the first-year student experience in the educational interface.ÌýHigher Education,Ìý79(4), 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00429-w Ìý
Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. M. (2018). Students as partners in learning and teaching: The benefits of co-creation of the curriculum.ÌýInternational Journal for Students As Partners,Ìý2(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i1.3207 Ìý
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences In Learning: I-Outcome AND Process.ÌýBritish Journal of Educational Psychology,Ìý46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x Ìý
McMurtrie, B. (2022, April 05). A ‘Stunning’ Level of Student Disconnection.ÌýThe Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved May 25, 2022, from https://www.chronicle.com/article/a-stunning-level-of-student-disconnection?cid=gen_sign_in Ìý
Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K. 1999.ÌýUnderstanding Learning and Teaching: The experience in higher education.ÌýBerkshire, UK: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education.
Ramsden, P. and Entwistle, N.J. 1981. “Effects of academic departments on students‘ approaches to studying.â€ÌýBritish Journal of Educational Psychology,Ìý51(3), 368-383.Ìý
Savin-Baden, M. & Major, C. (2013).ÌýQualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice.ÌýLondon and New York: Routledge.
Woods, D.R. (1994).ÌýProblem-based Learning: How to Gain the Most from PBL.ÌýWaterdown, ON: D.R. Woods.