Friday, April 17, 2015 1:00 pm
-
1:00 pm
EDT (GMT -04:00)
Of
the
thesis
entitled:ÌýPARTÌýTEN
:ÌýA
Case
for
Increased
Regulation
ofÌýRelocatable
Buildings
in
the
Province
of
Ontario
Abstract:
This
thesis
addresses
the
role
that
building
regulationsÌýand
codes
have
in
shaping
the
way
in
which
the
pre-fabricated
building
industryÌýdesigns,
manufactures
and
installs
Relocatable
Buildings
(RB)
used
within
theÌýInstitutional,
Commercial
and
IndustrialÌý(ICI)
sectors.ÌýÌýIt
looks
at
the
history
and
development
ofÌýthe
Relocatable
Building
industry
with
particular
focus
on
their
applicationÌýand
use
in
the
Province
of
Ontario,
within
the
larger
North
AmericanÌýcontext.ÌýÌýFamiliar
typologies
under
theÌýumbrella
of
relocatable
buildingsÌýinclude:
Manufactured
Homes,
EmergencyÌýShelters,
Portable
Classrooms
and
Industrial
Accommodations[1].ÌýÌýOf
these
categories
of
relocatable
buildings,Ìýthe
latter
two
will
be
the
focus
addressed
within
this
work
The majority of relocatable buildings areÌýmanufactured and constructed without the direct involvement of theÌýarchitectural profession.ÌýÌýMany of theseÌýbuildings barely meet basic requirements of health, safety, durability, andÌýoccupant comfort that is expectedÌýof contemporary construction for all otherÌýoccupied building typologies[2].ÌýÌýThis problematic building type needs toÌýgarner greater attention from designers, regulators and building officials inÌýorder to set in place the framework for clearer regulatory guidelines andÌýrequirementsÌýfor these structures.ÌýÌýSuchÌýa framework has the potential to lead to overall improvement of the quality ofÌýconstruction and product delivery within this sector.
This thesis illustrates proposed modificationsÌýof the primary documents which set the current regulatory framework for theseÌýbuildings in Canada: the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Z240 Standard forÌýManufactured Homes[3];Ìýthe CSA A277 Standards forÌýFactory Built Buildings; the Ontario Building CodeÌý(OBC) 2012 edition[4];Ìýand the National Building and model voluntary standards, intend to increase andÌýimprove the baseline expectations and requirements of building construction inÌýthis category with the intent of directlyÌýimproving the quality of end productÌýbeing generated by this billion dollar annual Canadian industry.ÌýÌýThe resultant goal being that design andÌýconstruction improvements based on changes in regulation, extend to benefit theÌýlives, and day-to-day experiences, of users andÌýoccupants of these relocatableÌýstructures.ÌýÌýThis thesis examines the potential, details and positiveÌýoutcomes for revising the OBC to reflect the addition of this new chapter toÌýthe code.
Ìý
The majority of relocatable buildings areÌýmanufactured and constructed without the direct involvement of theÌýarchitectural profession.ÌýÌýMany of theseÌýbuildings barely meet basic requirements of health, safety, durability, andÌýoccupant comfort that is expectedÌýof contemporary construction for all otherÌýoccupied building typologies[2].ÌýÌýThis problematic building type needs toÌýgarner greater attention from designers, regulators and building officials inÌýorder to set in place the framework for clearer regulatory guidelines andÌýrequirementsÌýfor these structures.ÌýÌýSuchÌýa framework has the potential to lead to overall improvement of the quality ofÌýconstruction and product delivery within this sector.
This thesis illustrates proposed modificationsÌýof the primary documents which set the current regulatory framework for theseÌýbuildings in Canada: the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Z240 Standard forÌýManufactured Homes[3];Ìýthe CSA A277 Standards forÌýFactory Built Buildings; the Ontario Building CodeÌý(OBC) 2012 edition[4];Ìýand the National Building and model voluntary standards, intend to increase andÌýimprove the baseline expectations and requirements of building construction inÌýthis category with the intent of directlyÌýimproving the quality of end productÌýbeing generated by this billion dollar annual Canadian industry.ÌýÌýThe resultant goal being that design andÌýconstruction improvements based on changes in regulation, extend to benefit theÌýlives, and day-to-day experiences, of users andÌýoccupants of these relocatableÌýstructures.ÌýÌýThis thesis examines the potential, details and positiveÌýoutcomes for revising the OBC to reflect the addition of this new chapter toÌýthe code.
Ìý
The examining committee is as follows:
Supervisor:
Committee Members:
Terri Meyer Boake,ÌýUniversity of À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ
Lloyd
Hunt,University
of
À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ
David
Lieberman,
UniversityÌýof
Toronto
External Reader:
Paul Dowsett, Architect,ÌýSustainable TO
The
committee
has
been
approved
as
authorized
by
the
Graduate
Studies
Committee.
The
Defence
Examination
will
take
place:
Ìý
Friday
April
17,
2015
1:00PM
Architecture
RoomÌý2026
Ìý
A
copy
of
the
thesis
is
available
for
perusal
in
ARC
2106A.