Thesis Defence: Kyle Brill

Friday, January 15, 2016 9:30 am - 9:30 am EST (GMT -05:00)

Of the thesis entitled:ÌýStates of Dependency -ÌýInfrastructuresÌýof the Commons ÌýÌý

Abstract:

TheÌýthesis States of Dependency is concerned with exploring architecturesÌýrelationship to socio-political and ethnographic conflict within Jerusalem. AsÌýa city of incredible political and national importance to both Israelis andÌýPalestinians, its planning and urban development have become inseparablyÌýlinked to the multi generational conflict that has gripped it; a conflict whichÌýis fuelled by issues of sovereignty, cultural identity, messianic mythology,ÌýandÌýreligious history. Within the context of post 1967 Jerusalem, architectureÌýand urban planning have been delegated the task of both constructing nationalÌýidentity, and in solidifying the relationships, or lack thereof, betweenÌýIsraelis andÌýPalestinians. Thus, the way in which the city is designed andÌýconstructed is essential to the management the conflict at an urban scale;Ìýengendering an ideology of ‘border making’ between Jerusalem’s ethnicÌýcommunities. Given this theÌýimage of the city, and how it is understood, becomeÌýessential components in furthering ethnically exclusionary practices. ThisÌýthesis explores the connection between architectural expression, ourÌýperceptions of it, and the perpetuationÌýof the ethnic conflict in Jerusalem. ItÌýchallenges the definitively isolationist model of its ethnic communities byÌýseeking to define the role of public space within this context, and speculates onÌýthe formation of a commons between twoÌýsegregated communities; firmlyÌýentrenched in the idea that a scenario of political equality can only beÌýengendered through an understanding of the other.Ìý

Specifically, the work examines theÌýdistricts of west and east Musrara, sites just to the north of the Old City,Ìýand reimagines the civic function of the no-mans land that runs between them.ÌýThe project works to literally bridgeÌýthe Israeli western half and theÌýPalestinian eastern half of this area, and explores the educational and civicÌýrole that a truly public space may provide in this context. It asks whetherÌýarchitecture, and public space, can operate as mediatorsÌýwithin complex socialÌýsystems, thereby becoming mechanisms of political criticism. In this way, theÌýwork does not seek to propose an architecture which offers a solution to theÌýJerusalem question, but rather one that recognizes andÌýutilizes its urbanÌýreality to become the impetus for a solution to emerge. In essence, this workÌýis grounded firmly in the notion that within conditions of instability andÌýimbalance lie the potentials for new urban, architectural and socialÌýconditionsÌýto emerge; it proposes an infrastructure of the commons.

The examining committee is as follows:
Ìý

Supervisor:

DereckÌýRevington, University of À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ

CommitteeÌýMembers:

Adrian Blackwell, UniversityÌýof À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ

Robert Jan Van Pelt, University of À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ
ÌýÌý

External Reader:

Scott SorliÌý


The committee has been approved as authorized by the Graduate Studies Committee.

The Defence Examination will take place: Ìý

Friday January 15, 2016
9:30AM
ARC 2003Ìý

A copy of the thesis is available for perusal in ARC 2106A.