Friday, May 8, 2015 10:00 am
-
10:00 am
EDT (GMT -04:00)
Of
the
thesis
entitled:ÌýThe
City
under
the
City:
in/to
the
PATH
Repeated efforts by the city to promoteÌýthe PATH and allow it to be read as a single entity have been thwarted by theÌýdevelopers whose self-interests outweigh the importance of the largerÌýnetwork.ÌýÌýInconspicuous street entrancesÌýaddÌýto the problem, preventing the PATH from becoming a viable alternative toÌýstreet level sidewalks during the harsh winter months, humid summer days andÌýthe odd thundershower.ÌýÌýDaily commutersÌýwho have memorized specific routesÌýremain the most prevalent user group whileÌývisitors from out of town struggle to find the Eaton Centre from Union Station.
Ìý Ìý ÌýÌý
Accepting that the PATH is a collection ofÌýprivate spaces and not a public urban condition, this thesis explores theÌýpossibility of unifying its fragments with minimal architectural incisions thatÌýwould surgically mend the system.ÌýÌýTraversing the subterranean PATH would be facilitated by creating aÌýpermanent and legible navigation pattern within the tunnels, solving theÌýproblem of spatial orientation by intensely engaging the user’s directÌýexperience throughÌýsensory-based design.ÌýÌýSurface pavilions would provide visible access points from street levelÌýwhile protrusions from the underground would open up the PATH to naturalÌýlight.ÌýÌýThe goal of these strategicÌýalterations is to achieveÌýeffective utilization of the PATH by a full spectrumÌýof people, easing the pedestrian traffic flow through the downtown core.
Abstract:
BeneathÌýthe
congested
sidewalks
of
downtown
Toronto
is
an
expanding
undergroundÌýpedestrian
network
spanning
30
kilometres,
the
largest
urban
infrastructure
ofÌýits
kind.ÌýÌýBranded
as
the
PATH,
it
doesÌýnot
provide
a
clear
path
to
theÌýmajor
destinations
it
connects.ÌýÌýIt
is
a
non-place;
a
labyrinth
of
shoppingÌýcentres,
each
privately
owned
by
competing
developers
with
the
intent
toÌýdisorient
and
trap
consumers
within
their
property.Ìý
Repeated efforts by the city to promoteÌýthe PATH and allow it to be read as a single entity have been thwarted by theÌýdevelopers whose self-interests outweigh the importance of the largerÌýnetwork.ÌýÌýInconspicuous street entrancesÌýaddÌýto the problem, preventing the PATH from becoming a viable alternative toÌýstreet level sidewalks during the harsh winter months, humid summer days andÌýthe odd thundershower.ÌýÌýDaily commutersÌýwho have memorized specific routesÌýremain the most prevalent user group whileÌývisitors from out of town struggle to find the Eaton Centre from Union Station.
Ìý Ìý ÌýÌý
Accepting that the PATH is a collection ofÌýprivate spaces and not a public urban condition, this thesis explores theÌýpossibility of unifying its fragments with minimal architectural incisions thatÌýwould surgically mend the system.ÌýÌýTraversing the subterranean PATH would be facilitated by creating aÌýpermanent and legible navigation pattern within the tunnels, solving theÌýproblem of spatial orientation by intensely engaging the user’s directÌýexperience throughÌýsensory-based design.ÌýÌýSurface pavilions would provide visible access points from street levelÌýwhile protrusions from the underground would open up the PATH to naturalÌýlight.ÌýÌýThe goal of these strategicÌýalterations is to achieveÌýeffective utilization of the PATH by a full spectrumÌýof people, easing the pedestrian traffic flow through the downtown core.
The examining committee is as follows:
Supervisor:
Committee Members:
¸é¾±³¦°ìÌý´¡²Ô»å°ù¾±²µ³ó±ð³Ù³Ù¾±,ÌýUniversity of À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ
Val
Rynnimeri,University
of
À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ
Ryszard
Sliwka,
University
ofÌýWaterlooÌý
External Reader:
Catherine Dowling, RyersonÌýUniversity
The
committee
has
been
approved
as
authorized
by
the
Graduate
Studies
Committee.
The
Defence
Examination
will
take
place:
Ìý
Friday
May
8,
2015
10:00AM
Architecture
RoomÌý2026
Ìý
A
copy
of
the
thesis
is
available
for
perusal
in
ARC
2106A.