BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Drupal iCal API//EN
X-WR-CALNAME:Events items teaser
X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/Toronto
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Toronto
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Toronto
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZNAME:EDT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
DTSTART:20230312T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZNAME:EST
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
DTSTART:20221106T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:682ae5d4442b2
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20230512T103000
SEQUENCE:0
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20230512T113000
URL:/math/events/celebrate-international-women-math-day
 -dr-hilary-bergsieker
SUMMARY:Celebrate International Women in Math Day with Dr. Hilary Bergsieke
 r
CLASS:PUBLIC
DESCRIPTION:Summary \n\n [Celebrate International Women in Math Day Banner]
  \n\nCELEBRATE INTERNATIONAL WOMEN IN MATH DAY WITH DR. HILARY BERGSIEKER\
 n\nTHE SOCIAL “THREATWORK”: CONNECTING WOMEN'S EXCLUSION FROM STEM\nSO
 CIAL NETWORKS TO IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT GENDER STEREOTYPES\n\nABSTRACT:\n\n
 When\, why\, and with what effect are women sometimes excluded from\ninfor
 mal social networks in STEM fields? Drawing on social identity\nthreat and
  structural hole theories\, a series of studies assess social\nnetwork dyn
 amics that may limit women's full inclusion in STEM\ncircles. \nIn experi
 ments with 1\,065 ��ݮ��Ƶ undergraduates enrolled in\nmale-dominated STEM
  majors (including math)\, women (but not men)\nanticipated repetitional p
 enalties if they associated with a woman who\nexpressed stereotypically fe
 minine interests. Women whose social\nnetwork positions gave them less bro
 kerage (i.e.\, reduced ability to\nmanage information flows between unconn
 ected friends) were less\nwilling to befriend and socially integrate other
  women with feminine-\n(vs. STEM-) stereotypic interests. Next\, in field 
 research with 1\,247\nfull-time employees working at North American STEM o
 rganizations\, men\nwho held stronger STEM=male implicit associations repo
 rted less often\nchoosing to socialize with their female teammates. In tur
 n\, for women\nat these same organizations\, receiving fewer social ties f
 rom male\nteammates was associated with worse workplace outcomes: lower\ne
 ngagement\, self-efficacy\, and feelings of fit\, plus greater concerns\na
 bout being judged on the basis of gender at work. Finally\, a series\nof m
 athematical simulations model the estimated impact of men\nintervening to 
 counteract gender bias and support women's full\ninclusion in STEM workpla
 ces. Implications for advancing gender\ninclusion in STEM fields are discu
 ssed.\n\nVisit the Psych EDI working group webpage \n[https://uwaterloo.
 ca/psychology-equity-diversity-inclusion/about-psychology-edi/important-de
 finitions]before\nthe talk to learn some useful definitions. \n 
DTSTAMP:20250519T080332Z
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR