Ìý
Ìý
Professional advancement from one rank to the next is available to all non-administrative full-time and regular part-time librarians/archivists who have passed probation and who continue to demonstrate fully satisfactory job performance.Ìý It is the process through which a librarian/archivist (candidate) is reviewed by a group of their peers in regards to performance, impact on the organization and profession, and their readiness to advance through the professional ranks at the University of À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ.
It is the responsibility of librarians/archivists to participate in professional service activities, including the review and assessment of their colleagues. This responsibility extends to members of the library executive and department heads/managers, through their support and encouragement of professional development, research, and service activities as they pertain to the advancement of librarians/archivists.
This appendix outlines the procedures and criteria against which a candidate will be assessed for their suitability for advancement. It also details the roles of the Professional Advancement Review Committee (Committee) members and how they should evaluate the merit of a candidate's dossier. All potential committee members must declare conflicts of interest, as defined by Policy 69 - Conflict of Interest, for consideration and mediation by the University Librarian, the chair of the Committee.Ìý
The following sections describe professional advancement:
- B.1 - Review procedures
- B.2 - Review committee membership and roles
- B.3 - Ranks and criteria
- B.4 - Dossier
The following supplemental information is provided to guide advancement candidates:
Previous Page | Next Page (Proceeds to Appendix C)