Identifying polar molecules kinesthetically

When my high school chemistry class gets to polar molecules,we run into trouble because most of the students have neverheard of the word “vector” and, even though we’ve coveredVSEPR theory, they don’t have the spatial reasoning abilities tosee how polar bonds could cancel out or contribute to a dipoleby looking at drawings on the board. After doing my traditionalexplanation of how polar bonds can create polar moleculesusing Lewis diagrams and arrows, we move to the lab portion of the classroom where we have more space. I ask a couple of volunteers to model a simple molecule like HCl using a long(1-2 m) piece of tubing.

The rules for the molecules are as follows:

  • The tubing represents the bonding electrons.
  • Students represent the atoms.
  • 3D shapes of molecules are determined by VSEPR theory.
  • Students tug on the tubing based on the electronegativityof the atoms they represent.
  • Lone pairs are not depicted.

Since the tubing is stretchy and can be pulled by the students,we have the ability to depict polar bonds and thus, polarmolecules. With help from the spectators, we figure out theeffect the electronegativity of chlorine and hydrogen have onhow hard each person tugs on the tubing. I note that hydrogen can get only so close to chlorine due to repulsion of their
electron clouds, so the hydrogen person should not be movedby the tugging chlorine, just leaning toward the chlorine person.Then I ask the audience if this is a polar molecule, and theyusually all get that it is, indeed, polar. To make sure everyonethoroughly understands, I give an explanation, sometimesreferring to a Lewis structure drawn on a nearby white board. It’susually helpful to ask the volunteers to turn themselves into adiatomic molecule such as H2 or F2 to show that no matter how hard the atoms tug on the electrons in this tug-of-war match, the key is how hard they pull relative to their competition.

Next, we model CO2, a more complex situation. I ask for threevolunteers and give them four pieces of tubing, noting that twopieces of tubing represent a double bond. As they getthemselves into position, often with the help of a Lewis structure,I review VSEPR theory by reminding everyone that electronsposition themselves so that they are as far apart as possible.

Lewis dot diagram of carbon dioxide with the polarity arrowsThe audience critiques the model until all three people arepositioned in a straight line a couple meters long. Next, wefactor in the electronegativity of each atom so the oxygen peoplestart pulling on the central carbon person (the oxygens mightneed to be reminded that they are essentially twins with equalelectronegativity/strength). I ask the carbon person if she isbeing pulled one way or another. After some thought, she usually concludes “no”. I explain to the class that this is asituation in which polar bonds cancel each other out and refer toa Lewis structure of CO2 showing two dipole arrows.Said in simpler terms, since the carbon person is not being forced tolean in one direction or another, this molecule is nonpolar.

Moving on to an even more complex situation, I ask for fourvolunteers, give them three pieces of tubing and ask them tomodel BF3, a trigonalplanar molecule. It’s a little tricky to get allthe bond angles to be 120° and for everyone to pull equally, butwith a stretch of the imagination, everyone, especially thecentral boron person, can tell that boron’s electrons are notbeing pulled in any one direction and that this molecule isnonpolar. This is easier to accept if I give this same group another piece of tubing and tell them to model CH2O, another trigonal planar molecule. As the volunteers consider theirelectronegativity and adjust their tugging strength, everyone,including the audience, can see that the central carbon is pulledin one direction, toward the oxygen, making this variation of atrigonal planar molecule polar.


Now that the class understands how to model molecules and has warmed up with simple linear or planar particles, we moveon to even more challenging molecules: those with tetrahedraland pyramidal shapes. Since we have already discussedVSEPR theory and the impact lone pairs and bonding electronshave on molecular geometry, we can focus on the effect thatshape has on molecule polarity.

First, I ask a group of students to model NH3, a trigonal pyramidal molecule. At first, they usually make a planarmolecule, so I remind them that the 3D shape is really importantin determining polarity. After a little thinking, often times withsuggestions from the spectators, the hydrogen students squatdown and the nitrogen student stands tall, often holding thetubing above his head.

For the final challenge, I ask a group of volunteers to model CF4. It takes a bit of creativity to arrange themselves in a tetrahedron,but once the molecule is properly formed and the fluorine peoplestart pulling on the tubing, the carbon person realizes that thereis no clear direction in which he is being pulled. (It’s unlikely thatthe carbon will feel no net tugging direction since it’s really hardto get the angles and pulling strength perfect in a tetrahedron).

Once everyone understands why this is a nonpolar molecule, wego through related molecules by substituting hydrogens forfluorines, asking the carbon to report on the net tugging directionthat he feels.

To get the most mileage out of this activity, I don’t randomly assign people to portray the atoms. Instead, I pick the peoplewho have a very weak understanding of polarity (or chemistry ingeneral) and ask those people to be the central atom so thatthey can benefit the most from the first-hand, kinestheticexperience of this activity. By repeatedly asking for a new set ofvolunteers, nearly all the students are able to experience
polarity. It’s helpful to model particles whose Lewis structures we have already drawn and are displayed somewhere in the room. I also have some ball-and-stick models handy to remindthe students what these shapes look like and help positionthemselves accurately.

Once we’ve finished this activity, the students definitely have an improved comprehension of polarity and I find it is a memorableactivity that I can refer to later in the year when someone asksme a question about dipoles. Not only does the activity help mystudents understand polarity, but it’s also very effective atdeepening their comprehension of electronegativity, VSEPRtheory and molecular geometry, plus, it improves their ability to
look at a 2D Lewis structure and visualize what these particleslook like in 3D.

Two students pulling on the ends of a stretchy tub demonstration a HCl molecule HCl


three  students -- two pulling on the ends of a stretching tube with one pulling from the middle demonstrating a water moleculeWater molecule


three students -- two pulling on the ends of a stretching tube with one pulling from the middle demonstrating a water moleculeWater molecule - pulling from the centre between two students

one student pulling four ends of stretchy tubing with a four students holding the ends demonstrating a methane molecule

Student pulling from four ends of rubber tubing with each end being pulled by a student to demonstrate the polarity of CH4molecule