À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ

All costs associated with the visit will be reimbursed by the University of À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ, including mileage/flight or bus/train/taxi ticket(s), accommodation at theÌýÌý¾±²Ô , and meals.ÌýÌý

Airways Transit

Ìýis the transportation provider we use to transfer people to and from the airport and À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ Taxi for transportation within Kitchener À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ.

From Toronto Pearson International Airport, Terminal 1 -ÌýUponÌýexiting the security doors turn right and proceed to the escalator near postÌýE. Take the escalator down to the Ground Transportation Level. The Out of Town Van Services Desk is on your left at the bottom of the escalator (between doors R &ÌýS).

From Toronto Pearson International Airport, Terminal 3Ìý- If you are arriving on an international flight (including from the United States), turn left when you exit the baggage claim area and proceed along the terminal corridor. If you are arriving on a domestic flight, turn right when you exit the baggage claim area and proceed along the terminal corridor. The Out of Town Van Services Desk isÌýbetween doors C & D.ÌýÌý

Ìýis available 24 hours at 519-886-2121.Ìý

Accommodations

Reviewers will be accommodated at theÌý,Ìýlocated inÌýÌýat 110 Erb St West. The hotel is walking distance to the many shops and restaurants ofÌý.

Accommodations will be arranged on your behalfÌýand confirmations will be shared via email prior to your arrival.Ìý

Local Transportation to UW

Transportation to and from the University of À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ will be arranged by the AQuE Office and indicated on the site visit schedule. The is a short 5 minute drive, 5ÌýminuteÌýÌý´Ç°ù approximately 20 minute walk from the University of À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ campus.Ìý

The site visit will begin with a breakfast meetingÌýwith theÌýAssociate Vice-President, Academic (AVPA), and/or Associate Vice-President, Graduate Studies and Postdoctoral Affairs (AVPGSPA), as well as the Faculty Dean (designate or equivalent), and Department Chair/School Director and/or Program Director. The purpose of the meeting is toÌýprovide a high-level overview of the site visit process, what is expected of the external reviewers, andÌýanswer any questions that the site visit team may have before beginning the visit.Ìý

°Õ³ó±ðÌýscheduleÌýfor the site visit will be distributed to the reviewers approximately oneÌýweek before the visit. The reviewers will be scheduled to meetÌýwith a variety of individuals associated with the program(s), including but not limited to:Ìý

• Dean and/orÌýAssociate Dean(s) of the Faculty
• Principal, President, and/or Dean (for Affiliated and Federated Institutions of À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ)
• Chair/Director of the Department/School offering the program and/or Program Director
• Other administrators connected to the program, including Associate Chairs/Directors
• Faculty Members
• Staff
• Current students
• Liaison Librarian
• Co-op Faculty Liaison (co-op programs only)

The site visit will conclude with an exit meeting with the AVPA and/or AVPGSPA, andÌýthe Director, Academic Quality Enhancement (AQuE). The purpose of the debrief meeting is to discuss the review team's high level impressions, main issues of concern andÌýsuggestions for improvement, and provide any off-the-record commentary that may require follow up by the AVPA or AVPGSPA. This is also an opportunity for the reviewers to ask any questions pertaining to theÌýexternal reviewers' reportÌýfor cyclical program reviewsÌý´Ç°ù external reviewer's report for new programs.

Program review teams evaluating undergraduate degree programs and/or graduate degrees or diplomas, typically consist of two external appraisers and an internal participant (i.e., support person) who is a faculty member at the University of À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ. A list of potential internal support persons is compiled by the AVPA/AVPGSPA and kept on file. The AVPA/AVPGSPA select reviewers based on rank, research and teaching activities, administrative experience, and awards and recognition. The internal support person is invited to participate in the two-day site visit by the AQuE Office, on behalf of the AVPA or AVPGSPA.

The internal support person is selected from a faculty other than the one hosting the program(s) under review, to ensure an arm’s length relationship to the program. The faculty member should have sufficient understanding of À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ administrative and academic practices to ensure that their contributions to the external reviewers’ site visit are meaningful.

The internal member plays a critical role in the program review process. In addition to assisting the external reviewers to find their way around campus, the internal member also acts as a resource for the review team on À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ’s organization and culture, aspects of À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ’s operations that may differ from the norms at other universities such as the prominent place of co-operative education, and any other aspect of the university that could be useful in contextualizing what the external reviewers read or hear, especially during the site visit. The internal support person joins the external members for all aspects of the site visit while they areÌýon campus, including the orientation meeting at the start of the site visit on day one (which is typically a breakfast meeting with the AVPA and/or AVPGSPA, Chair/Director of the program, and Dean or designate), and the debrief meeting at the end of the site visit on day two, with the AVPA and/or AVPGSPA and the Director of Academic Quality Enhancement (AQuE).

The internal support persons required activities end when the site visit is complete. The internal member is not responsible nor expected to participate in writing the external reviewers’ report, although they may offer to be available by email or phone should questions arise during the writing of the external reviewers’ report.

Previous reviewers report that their participation in the process was rewarding and that they gained a broader and meaningful perspective of the various offerings and activities on campus. In gratitude of the time commitment demanded and to recognize the service contribution, a letter from the AVPA and/or AVPGSPA is provided to each internal support person.

The external reviewers' report is due within two weeks of the end of the site visit. It should be completed using the following templates (alsoÌýprovided over email):

• External reviewers' report for cyclical program reviews
• External reviewers' report for new programs

The report will be relatively short and the majority of the report can be completed before the visit and then supplemented with information gained through discussions during the visit.Ìý The AQuE OfficeÌýwill try to build some time into the site visit schedule for the reviewers to discuss the report as well.Ìý Evenings are also free to work on the report.

The completed External Reviewers' Report is confidential and should be submitted to the AQuE Office. When received, the report will be reviewed by the AQuE Office, and then the AVPAÌýand/or AVPGSPA. Finally, the report will be distributed to the Vice-PresidentÌýAcademic and Provost,ÌýFaculty Dean (or equivalent), relevant Associate Dean(s) and the program Chair/Director.ÌýThe Chair/Director then prepare a Program Response to the external reviewers'Ìýrecommendations and outline a plan for implementation. The Dean will also provide a separate response to these recommendations based on the Program Response.Ìý

Honoraria for this evaluation will be processed upon receipt of the external reviewers' report.Ìý

Undergraduate minors, options and diplomas are not required to be reviewed by the Quality Council; however, the University of À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ chooses to review these offerings to ensure the quality of the university’s academic programming. These reviews are undertaken by two internal appraisers (i.e., internal reviewers) who are faculty members at the University of À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ. The AVPA selects one member from a list of suggested reviewers provided by the program who are familiar with the offering, but are not directly involved in it, andÌýa second faculty member from aÌýdifferent Faculty who has no association to the offering under review.Ìý A list of potential internal reviewers is compiled by the AVPA and kept on file. The AVPA selects reviewers based on rank, research and teaching activities, administrative experience, awards and recognition. The internal reviewers are invited to participate in a brief siteÌývisit by the AQuE Office, on behalf of the AVPA.

The internal reviewers essentially serve the same purpose as the external appraisers, although they areÌýnotÌýexternal to the university. Reviewers engage in a day-long itinerary that involves meeting with faculty, students, administrators and staff, and tour spaces associated with the offering. The day often starts with an orientation meeting, which is typically a breakfast meeting with the AVPA, Chair/Director of the program, and Dean (or designate), and ends with a debrief meeting with the AVPA and Director of Academic Quality EnhancementÌý(AQuE).

Reviewers are asked to appraise the academic program and prepare a reviewers’ report, using the same report template used by external reviewers who evaluate undergraduate degree programs and/or graduate degrees or diplomas. The report is due two weeks following the one-day visit.

An honorarium is paid to the internal reviewers in recognition of the time commitment involved in the preparation of the reviewers’ report. Previous reviewers also report that their participation in the process was rewarding and that they gained a broader and meaningful perspective of the various offerings and activities on campus.

• University of À¶Ý®ÊÓƵ Strategic Plan 2020-2025:ÌýConnecting Imagination with Impact
• Student Experience Review 2019